BC stands for NEO’s Banned Classic. This BC article was originally published as “Why Are We Being Lied To” by NEO on 30.12.13. For some reason, this article is missing from Google search results. Since this article remains pretty relevant to those geopolitical events that are taking place on the geopolitical stage today, we deem it possible to present it to our readers once again.

Should it go missing again, you may be confident that you will see it republished by NEO once more, should it still remain relevant by that time. Over the past few years, there has been a general breakdown of how reality is perceived. In fact, the term “reality” itself is under assault, everything from issues of controlled news, false flag terrorism, challenges to basic physical laws and even issues of “disclosure,” the tantalizing idea that a complex interstellar world exists.

“Why Are We Being Lied To”

A very real part of what has happened is a calculated attack on traditions and institutions through psychological warfare, a subset of “game theory warfare,” itself a subset of “chaos theory.”

Thus, we doubt or believe based on a flow of controlled information and orchestrated events.

However, controlling information has proven a risky business. Toward that end, what had always been a “lunatic fringe” of biblical prophecy, jingoism or agenda-driven “revisionism” has now been supplanted with a virtual ocean of insanity that has crept into the public domain.

When traced to its roots, too often one finds powerful organizations. During the last few days, Washington think tanks have released “rumors” citing president Obama as a Kenyan born homosexual, “Bathhouse Barry,” of radical Muslim roots who attempted to gain control of America’s nuclear arsenal in order to destroy Israel.

These stories and dozens like them all trace down to sources close to the leadership of the “opposition party,” the bizarre confederation of right-wing extremists, the Israel lobby and those aspects of the financial industry that can only be termed “organized crime.”

Sadly, up to 30% of the American public believes, not just these missives but things far stranger. Among that 30% is the majority of the leadership of America’s armed forces, security services and police, groups that have descended the evolutionary ladder at a frightening pace.

As American “humorist”, Jim W. Dean, so often says, “You just can make these things up.”

What the public is left with is uncertainty, in some ways preferable to blind ignorance. Though the original intent, a voice in television shows such as “X Files,” in the oft-repeated theme, “Believe No One,” is to destroy public confidence in institutions, this hasn’t worked out as planned.

Perhaps that’s why they call it “chaos theory.”

Long ago, science developed its own methods, “epistemology,” for discerning what is “likely.” Scientific modeling or experimental method has long since become unreliable indicators as they are dependent on the “subjectivity” of observation and the vagaries of statistical analysis, the science of making 2 plus two equals three.

The real basis of analysis since the latter half of the 20th century has been the philosophy that sneaks into films. In America, some organized crime groups that had “lost their roots” reinvented themselves based on the “Godfather” films of Francis Ford Coppola.

One film, “The Usual Suspects,” has a line that has served me well. “The biggest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince people he didn’t exist.”

Toward that end, the modern “mainstream media seems, when their “work product” is analyzed using methodologies developed for intelligence analysis, appears to be “tasked” in three ways:

Covering the tracks of very real secret societies and conspiracies

Protecting a history that is almost entirely false

Spewing a continual narrative both unquestioned and unsupportable

In the process, we have created an incubator for the rise of mediocrity. President George W. Bush has evidenced this more than any individual in recent years.

A simple trip to “YouTube” will give evidence of this. His glaring ignorance and endless lapses of decorum were far from simply anecdotal. Yes, he really thought “Africa” was a country. Is it true he couldn’t find Africa on a map?

I have privately been assured that though this was the case when he took office in 2001, after visiting Africa he became aware. I would only know this as the author of his briefing materials on his last visit.

Touching on the issue of redress, the restoration of reality or “truth” has become a process well beyond “encyclopedic.”

Approaching this task, television shows in the US, be they “The Secret History of World War II” or Oliver Stone’s “Untold History of the United States,” not only fall short of the task but exist more to close doors than open them.

Such efforts and they are many, perhaps endless, are “gatekeeper functions.”

The question people enjoy and ask most often is this; “Is there a secret world out there.” The answer is “yes.”

What then qualifies a source as genuine and how does one discern real information from the endless “blind alleys” that have been created to channel modern-day adventurers and explorers into areas of harmless or perhaps “not so harmless” confusion?

Our tools are observation, reason, and analysis. Beyond that, we are faced with the traditional issues of faith, what do we believe, what do we trust?

More and more intuition itself has to serve, where such a thing still exists. Toward that end, we can begin a walk down several paths in such areas a “what can be told” or “what can be reasonably surmised.” At the pinnacle, one is faced with unpleasant revelations, that the world is ruled by secret societies, all of which are rooted in beliefs that can be termed “supernatural” or “extraterrestrial.”

What can be told is that these organizations are both centuries-old “societies” and quasi-governmental organizations whose efforts periodically surface and, in doing so, give evidence of a reality that in startling ways resembles popular science fiction. What can be told is that this coincidental similarity is no accident. What is safest is approaching what we know and can prove in the mundane world and how it diverges from popular mythology.

For Americans, the Kennedy assassination was paramount, at least prior to 9/11.

As the 50th anniversary of that even passed recently, many were disturbed at the media’s attempts to restore public confidence in the Warren Report. The popular film, JFK ended such beliefs forever. Even prior to its release, the “Oswald and the Magic Bullet” theory was an obvious sham. Yet, millions of Americans were sickened when the media again tried to “put the toothpaste back in the tube.”24 Nov 1963, Dallas, Texas, USA — A television broadcast captures guards and secret service agents escorting Lee Harvey Oswald through the Dallas police headquarters two days after his arrest in conjunction with the assassination of President Kennedy. Oswald was shot by local night club owner Jack Ruby shortly after this photograph was taken. — Image by © CORBIS

This is the official finding of the US government, issued in 1976 by the House Select Committee on Assassinations:

Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President. Scientific evidence negates some specific conspiracy allegations.

The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy

Funny thing, nobody mentioned any of this, the public finding of the US government, when selling the “lone gunman” story to a new generation. Similarly, 9/11 has the exact same problem. The 9/11 Commission Report was rescinded by a majority of members who then asked for members of the Bush administration to be prosecuted for both perjury and withholding evidence.

This is a public record. Since that time, not only has hard evidence discovered a domestic conspiracy working in concert with foreign intelligence agencies at the heart of 9/11 but finding a reputable scientist that supports the conclusions of the original 9/11 Commission report is almost impossible. There is undeniable hard proof that the 7/7 attacks in Britain were also “false flag” attacks.

There is undeniable hard proof that the invasion of not just Iraq but Afghanistan was planned long before 9/11, not just those nations but five others as well as stated by General Wesley Clark and confirmed by Gwyneth Todd and many others.

Of recent terror attacks and mass killings, the following are known to be “false flag attacks,” orchestrated by intelligence agencies. By “known,” I mean exactly that, no doubt whatsoever.

The DC sniper attacks and subsequent anthrax poisonings, the Breveik killings in Norway, Sandy Hook, the “Gabby Giffords” shootings, the Fort Hood shootings and the Boston Marathon bombings

There are no “theories” involved, there is a mass of evidence and clear proof that the story has given the public in each of these cases in outlandish and unreasonable.

Were one to examine recent events involving Syria, the close alignment of Al Qaeda with groups within US intelligence and their Saudi and Israeli counterparts should “deconstruct” the entirety of the basis for America’s “War on Terror.” Why hasn’t it?

Why does the media continue to claim that, though the Taliban ended almost all opium production in Afghanistan, the record heroin production, now over 90% of world supplies now produced there, is being flown around the world by that same organization that doesn’t possess a single aircraft?

Can one see a coincidental relationship between heroin trafficking and production and CIA involvement in Afghanistan? Is there historical evidence that this is not the first time? Can we say “Golden Triangle” and “Cali Cartel?”

There are areas more important to human development that simple proof that criminal elements have manipulated world events that have probably brought about the deaths of several million people.

Let’s take a short look at the science. To Einstein, the “holy grail” was solving unified field theory. Simply put, perhaps overly so, the relationship between gravity and magnetism and waves and particles never fit within his ideas of general relativity.

Recent revelations that particles travel at above the speed of light, the result of super-collider experiments, have, in actuality, totally disproven Einstein’s original theories. There is a problem when dealing with science. As for history or “news,” it can generally be invented. In science, there are communities that share information, affirm publishings and follow events very carefully. Thus, when areas of research “go dark,” and capabilities are spoken of or even exhibited that are beyond accepted scientific advances, we are challenging something more serious than “public opinion.” Yet, exactly this has happened.

Again, we enter the areas of “what can be told.” To those who work in engineering, certain scientific advances, particularly the jump from the development of the transistor to the development of the first integrated circuit is believed to be “non-linear.” This means technologies that have no history of development have entered our daily lives. You can see where this goes, an area no one wants to travel.

Remember “cold fusion?” Remember that it was a “fraud?” We were told that the first experiments were not able to be duplicated that this “free energy” technology was a dead end? Ever hear of LENR?

This stands for Low Energy Nuclear Reactions. The term actually means “cold fusion.” Billions are spent each year, by governments and private corporations, in the development of cold fusion projects. Units exist that could power automobiles, aircraft, even cities. A quick Google search will list the companies involved, the factories and laboratories, the investment opportunities and yet why is none of this reported? Would oil be worthless?

Would conventional nuclear power, even wind, and solar power, be worthless? Why are we being lied to, “in plain sight” as it were? The answer isn’t simple but there is an answer of sorts. The excuse given originates from the writings of Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus, who in 1798, espoused that “progress” would bring about limitless population growth that would end in disaster. So, we hide technologies. We have had the ability for decades to defeat gravity using technologies developed in Germany in the 1930s, rumored to have been given to them by extraterrestrials.

The US built its first anti-gravity “ship” in 1953. I have seen it. It is old and ugly but works, sort of. Nanotechnologies developed in labs “impossibly” at “0 g” have produced semiconductors capable of creating fields that allow vehicle performance typically attributed to UFOs. One of the more common but less spoken of areas is weather modification. Energy weapons developed in “dark projects” are being used to modify the weather in some areas of the world, particularly the oil-rich states of the Persian Gulf.

This is more “hidden in plain sight” use of non-existent technology. We have only touched on a few areas, they are endless. What we can prove is that events are not what they seem, science is not what it seems, this is clear. What is also clear is that anything we are told is suspect and not by accident.

Mistrust in everything is engineered into our very being as a method of control, absolute control.